TPT
Total:
$0.00

Logical Fallacies Meme Lesson Rhetorical Fallacies Handout and Google Slides

Rated 4.7 out of 5, based on 61 reviews
4.7 (61 ratings)
;
First Printables
18 Followers
Grade Levels
6th - 12th
Resource Type
Standards
Formats Included
  • Google Slides™
Pages
10 pages
$6.75
$6.75
Share this resource
Report this resource to TPT
First Printables
18 Followers
Made for Google Drive™
This resource can be used by students on Google Drive or Google Classroom. To access this resource, you’ll need to allow TPT to add it to your Google Drive. See our FAQ and Privacy Policy for more information.

What educators are saying

My students thought this was funny and it helped keep them engaged in the lesson. In addition, it helped them to actually remember the terms because of the memes they were paired with.
This was a great resource to introduce students to the concept of fallacies. They enjoyed the creative images and loved discussing fallacies in all areas with one another.

Description

LOGICAL FALLACY MEMES

Your students will get a fun and engaging introductory lesson to 10 of the most common logical / rhetorical fallacies using memes and the included handout.

The interactive slide show allows students to play along and try to determine which fallacy is represented by each meme before you reveal the answer. The included handout has a description and an example for all 10 featured fallacies.

Fallacies covered in this lesson include:

Slippery Slope
Ad Hominem
Bandwagon Appeal or Ad Populum
Ignoring the Question
Straw Man
False Authority
Red Herring
Dogmatism
False Analogy
Hasty Generalization

Total Pages
10 pages
Answer Key
Included
Teaching Duration
30 minutes
Report this resource to TPT
Reported resources will be reviewed by our team. Report this resource to let us know if this resource violates TPT’s content guidelines.

Standards

to see state-specific standards (only available in the US).
Delineate and evaluate the argument and specific claims in a text, assessing whether the reasoning is sound and the evidence is relevant and sufficient; recognize when irrelevant evidence is introduced.
Delineate and evaluate the argument and specific claims in a text, assessing whether the reasoning is valid and the evidence is relevant and sufficient; identify false statements and fallacious reasoning.
Analyze and evaluate the effectiveness of the structure an author uses in his or her exposition or argument, including whether the structure makes points clear, convincing, and engaging.

Reviews

Questions & Answers

18 Followers